This week I read The Most Happy by Helen R. Davis. I had recently read her alternative history series on Cleopatra and really enjoyed it, but this was the first alternative history of Anne Boleyn I’ve ever read. I’ve always wondered about the “what ifs,” of course. What if Anne had survived Henry’s obsession? What if she had given Henry a son and heir?
In this story, Elizabeth has a twin brother, and Henry dies
at the 1536 joust. Two small quirks of fate that could have changed everything.
Anne becomes queen regent, ruling for her son until he is of age.
What I enjoyed about this novel was one of the things I
enjoyed so much about the Cleopatra series, catching references to familiar
people and events and lines of dialogue that were spoken in other contexts.
What of Anne herself? In fiction, she’s sometimes been
portrayed as an outright nasty creature that makes you wonder what Henry ever
saw in her. I enjoyed this Anne and appreciated the balanced view of her
character. This is an Anne who makes mistakes and regrets them. She’s certainly
not saintly, but she tries to do the right thing both for her children, for the
reformed faith, and for the country.
We also see the lives of other figures of the Tudor court
play out. What would have happened to Jane Seymour or Jane Rochford? What about
little Katheryn Howard, whose real fate was to meet the axe just like her
cousin?
But what I enjoyed the most was exploring what might have been
if Anne had been able to fully exercise her gifts. She was a sharply
intelligent woman with a zeal for religious reform. At one point, Henry trusted
her enough to meet with ambassadors for him and choose bishops for the new English
church. What if her political acumen had been given wings? I really enjoyed
exploring the possibilities with this novel.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comment. It will be added after the administrator screens for spam.